Skip to content
Fire Secure UK

Fire Strategies

Introduction

A fire strategy explains how a building will achieve an appropriate standard of fire safety through its design, construction, management and use.

It should bring together the building's:

  • Occupancy and use assumptions
  • Evacuation strategy
  • Means of warning and escape
  • Compartmentation and structural fire protection
  • Active fire protection systems
  • External fire spread provisions
  • Firefighting access and facilities
  • Fire safety management requirements
  • Interfaces between fire safety systems and other building systems

A fire strategy is not simply a report produced at the end of a design. It should develop with the project, record the basis of important decisions and remain coordinated with the drawings, specifications and specialist designs.

The RIBA Plan of Work identifies the Fire Safety Strategy as a core project strategy that begins with the project brief, develops through design and construction, and continues into the management of the completed building.


Important Terminology

The terms Stage 1, Stage 2, Stage 3 and Stage 4 fire strategy are commonly used to describe the maturity of the fire strategy alongside the corresponding RIBA design stages:

These are project delivery stages, not statutory grades or legally defined classes of fire strategy.

A client, consultant or contractor may use different names, such as:

  • Fire safety brief
  • Outline fire strategy
  • Concept fire strategy
  • Developed fire strategy
  • Coordinated fire strategy
  • Technical fire strategy
  • Construction fire strategy
  • As-built fire strategy

The title alone does not establish the quality or completeness of the document. The content must be appropriate to the project stage and sufficiently detailed to support the decisions being made.


Fire Strategy Versus Other Documents

A fire strategy is related to several other documents but is not interchangeable with them.

Document Primary purpose
Fire strategy Defines how the building is intended to achieve fire safety and coordinates the design, systems and management assumptions.
Planning fire statement Provides planning-stage information on fire safety matters relevant to land-use planning, such as site layout, fire appliance access and firefighting water. It is not normally a full Building Regulations fire strategy.
Fire risk assessment Assesses fire risk in an occupied premises and identifies the general fire precautions required. It is principally an operational document, not a substitute for a design fire strategy.
Fire and emergency file A submission document required for certain higher-risk building work in England. Government guidance notes that it is often known as a fire strategy.
Building Regulations compliance statement Explains how proposed higher-risk building work will meet the functional requirements of the Building Regulations and identifies the guidance, standards or design codes used.
Cause-and-effect matrix Defines how fire alarm inputs and other initiating events operate outputs and connected systems. It is derived from the evacuation strategy and fire strategy; it does not replace them.
Regulation 38 information Fire safety information handed to the Responsible Person at completion or occupation so the building can be safely operated and maintained.
Fire safety management plan Defines the management arrangements needed to support the strategy in use, including staffing, testing, maintenance, training and emergency procedures.

Core Principle

The design of the fire alarm and other active systems should support the required fire and evacuation procedures.

The evacuation strategy should not be reverse-engineered around a convenient panel configuration or a pre-selected cause-and-effect arrangement. BS 5839-1:2025 specifically establishes that the fire detection and alarm system should support the building's fire evacuation strategy.

This means the following should normally be established before the final alarm design is completed:

  • Whether evacuation is simultaneous, phased, progressive horizontal, stay put, delayed or staff-led
  • Which occupants may require assistance
  • Whether an investigation period is permitted
  • Which areas receive alert, evacuate or staff alarm signals
  • How automatic systems respond to different initiating events
  • What manual controls are required
  • Which actions must occur immediately and which may be delayed
  • How failures, disablements and overrides are managed

See also:


How the Strategy Develops

The strategy should become progressively more detailed without losing the original fire safety objectives.

Subject Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4
Primary purpose Define requirements and constraints Establish the concept Coordinate and validate the design Complete the technical design
Occupancy Initial use and vulnerability assumptions Design occupancy and management assumptions Confirmed occupancy numbers and distribution Final design values and operational limitations
Evacuation Required outcomes and likely approach Concept evacuation philosophy Coordinated evacuation zones, routes and procedures Fully specified arrangements and system logic
Means of escape Key constraints and feasibility Number and broad arrangement of exits, stairs and cores Travel distances, capacities and routes coordinated Final dimensions, details, signage and specifications
Compartmentation High-level need Primary compartment principles Boundaries, ratings and interfaces coordinated Detailed construction, junction and penetration requirements
Structural fire resistance Required approach identified Preliminary periods and structural concept Fire resistance coordinated with structure Final specifications and engineering details
Fire alarm Need, objectives and user requirements Category and alarm philosophy developed Detection coverage, zones and interfaces coordinated Full design, calculations, drawings, specifications and testable cause and effect
Smoke control Need and objectives identified System concept selected Zones, shafts, controls and design basis coordinated Final calculations, schematics, controls and installation information
Suppression Need and design objective identified System type and broad extent selected Hazard classes, water supplies and interfaces coordinated Final specialist design and specifications
Firefighting facilities Site and access constraints identified Access, shafts, lifts and water concepts developed Layout and dimensions coordinated Final technical details and specifications
External walls Regulatory and site constraints identified Façade concept reviewed Materials, cavity strategy and interfaces coordinated Final build-ups, barriers, fixings and evidence
Cause and effect Key operating scenarios identified Principal sequences described Functional matrix coordinated across systems Detailed, testable matrix issued for implementation
Management Client and user requirements identified Management assumptions recorded Staffing and procedural dependencies validated Final operational requirements and handover information

Information That Should Remain Consistent

The following information should agree across the fire strategy, drawings, specifications and specialist system designs:

  • Building height, storey count and use
  • Occupancy figures and occupant characteristics
  • Evacuation strategy
  • Fire alarm category and extent
  • Detection, alarm and evacuation zones
  • Compartment and sub-compartment boundaries
  • Fire-resistance periods
  • Fire door ratings and functions
  • Stair and escape route capacities
  • Smoke-control zones and design objectives
  • Sprinkler or suppression assumptions
  • Firefighting shaft, lift and access arrangements
  • External-wall and cavity-barrier strategy
  • Cause-and-effect sequences
  • Management and staffing assumptions
  • Variations, departures and fire-engineered solutions

A mismatch between these documents can be more serious than a missing paragraph because different contractors may build different interpretations of the same strategy.


Responsibilities and Information Exchange

Responsibility for the fire strategy and each specialist design should be defined early.

The fire strategy author may define the required performance of a system without taking responsibility for every part of its detailed design. For example:

  • The fire strategy may define the required alarm category and evacuation sequence.
  • The fire alarm designer may determine the detector, sounder, loop and circuit design.
  • The smoke-control designer may calculate fan duty, shaft size and control arrangements.
  • The sprinkler designer may determine hydraulic design and water supply requirements.
  • The architect may coordinate compartment lines, doors and penetrations.
  • The structural engineer may design the structure for the required fire-resistance period.
  • The principal designer may coordinate the overall Building Regulations design.

A design responsibility matrix should clearly identify:

  • Who specifies each fire safety measure
  • Who completes the technical design
  • Who coordinates interfaces
  • Who approves changes
  • Who provides installation information
  • Who inspects the work
  • Who commissions and witnesses tests
  • Who produces as-built information
  • Who maintains the information after handover

BS 5839-1:2025 also requires responsibilities for fire alarm design, installation, commissioning and handover to be clearly defined and documented.


Cause-and-Effect Development by Stage

A cause-and-effect matrix should mature with the fire strategy.

Stage 1

Normally limited to the key operational scenarios, for example:

  • Automatic detection initiates evacuation
  • Manual call point initiates immediate evacuation
  • Sprinkler flow initiates full alarm and monitoring transmission
  • Fire alarm releases access-controlled doors
  • Fire alarm recalls or grounds lifts
  • Smoke control operates by fire zone

Stage 2

The principal sequences should be defined, including:

  • Alarm stages
  • Evacuation philosophy
  • Broad zoning
  • Investigation periods
  • Major connected systems
  • Automatic and manual escalation principles

Stage 3

A coordinated functional matrix should normally identify:

  • Input types and functional groups
  • Fire detection zones and alarm zones
  • Output groups
  • Alert and evacuation sequences
  • Delays and coincidence arrangements
  • Smoke-control actions
  • Door, lift, HVAC and access-control actions
  • Suppression and sprinkler interfaces
  • Alarm receiving centre transmission
  • Firefighter and management controls

The Stage 3 matrix should be sufficiently developed to coordinate all disciplines, but it may still use functional groups rather than final device addresses or panel programming references.

Stage 4

The matrix should be detailed enough to implement, commission and witness. It should identify, where applicable:

  • Exact initiating device or defined input group
  • Exact output action or defined output group
  • Alarm zone and evacuation state
  • Time delays and timer cancellation
  • Coincidence dependencies
  • Latching and reset behaviour
  • Manual overrides and firefighter controls
  • Disablement and isolation behaviour
  • Fail-safe or fault response
  • Interfaces between separate control systems
  • Required feedback and monitoring
  • References to drawings, schedules and specifications
  • Test method and acceptance criteria

BS 5839-1:2025 requires the completed fire alarm documentation to include a cause-and-effect matrix or a text description of how the cause and effect operates.


Existing Buildings

Fire strategy development for an existing building requires particular care.

Existing drawings and previous strategies should not automatically be treated as accurate. The project should identify:

  • Which information has been verified
  • Which assumptions remain unverified
  • What intrusive surveys or opening-up are required
  • Whether the existing compartmentation is continuous
  • Whether existing doors, dampers, shafts and penetrations match the records
  • Whether the existing alarm and smoke-control systems can support the proposed strategy
  • Whether changes in use, occupancy or layout affect the original design assumptions
  • Whether temporary measures are required during the works

Unknown existing conditions should be recorded as risks with a clear verification plan.


Higher-Risk Buildings in England

For work within the higher-risk building regime, the fire strategy may form part of a wider controlled information set.

Depending on the work, this may include:

  • Building Regulations compliance statement
  • Fire and emergency file
  • Change control plan
  • Construction control plan
  • Competence declaration
  • Mandatory occurrence reporting plan
  • Partial completion strategy
  • Golden thread information

The approved information must remain coordinated throughout the work. Changes affecting the agreed fire strategy, escape routes, stairs, evacuation lifts, external walls, active systems, passive systems or design assumptions may require formal change control.


After Stage 4

Stage 4 is the completion of the technical design, not the end of the fire strategy.

During Stage 5 and Stage 6, the strategy should be:

  • Updated for accepted design changes
  • Checked against installed work
  • Supported by inspection and test evidence
  • Updated to reflect final cause-and-effect programming
  • Reconciled with as-built drawings and schedules
  • Included within the Regulation 38 or equivalent handover information
  • Transferred to the Responsible Person, Accountable Person or building operator
  • Used to inform emergency procedures and the fire risk assessment

An as-built strategy should describe the building that was actually constructed, not merely reissue the Stage 4 design report with a new revision number.


Common Failures

  • Treating the fire strategy as an isolated consultant report
  • Starting the strategy after the architecture has already fixed the cores and escape routes
  • Using a planning fire statement as though it were a complete Building Regulations strategy
  • Carrying unverified assumptions through every revision
  • Failing to identify design responsibilities
  • Leaving major interfaces to specialist subcontractors without coordinated requirements
  • Producing a detailed system design before the evacuation philosophy is agreed
  • Issuing a Stage 3 strategy that is too vague to coordinate the technical design
  • Calling a document Stage 4 when it still contains unresolved fundamental design matters
  • Allowing value engineering or substitutions to change the fire strategy without review
  • Failing to update the strategy and drawings to the as-built condition

Important: This page provides general technical guidance. The required content and level of detail depend on the building, jurisdiction, occupancy, procurement route and applicable approval process. A competent fire safety professional should determine the project-specific strategy.

Last updated 15 August 2026 at 20:21 UTC